The vision that the ordinary citizen of our political class, is disappointing. The distance and the discredit that seems to exist between the two is becoming increasingly clear. We live in a resigned, hopeless and lacking motivation. The more suspicious every day citizens and lower trust in the promises made by politicians, because it made a world exclusive for them, fixing their salaries regardless of the economic situation of their fellow citizens their rights to receive pension is half demanding than for any worker and live in his world, with their statistics on the social pulse in another dimension, far from the reality of the street. In addition, it is obvious belief that almost always lie to us, they say always politically correct, but his real intention is another.
say is fabricating lies daily work of the creator of images, make us believe Queuña detergent removes all stains without effort is his work, though not true. Political parties hiring advertising teams to give credibility to any argument, election promise, etc. His effort is that the recipient is identified with the discourse of the issuer and once obtained this way, the political lie is played socially as well, a social majority is satisfied and doubts and uncertainties disappear.
disqualify a good name on the charge of corrupt does not require much effort. Launching a rumor and then report it is not complex. Anything goes and there is no code of ethics. They spend all day denying and fighting back. However, the fabrication of lies in politics, is bound to stand the test of time, must endure, you can not short-lived as I would lose legitimacy. The need to believe the lie form part of the plot. Need to be repeated, consistent, the argument to achieve the objective.
The political lie, responds to a conscious, deliberate, of hiding information and evidence, particularly when it weakens the enemy government, opposition, lobby, etc. Examples of this: the fallacious argument put forward by the "trio of the Azores", possession of weapons of mass destruction held by Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Manipulation, when reporting on the responsibility for the bombing of the Atocha station on 11 March 2004. Convince the English and world population that ETA had been permitted a political advantage at a time general election. Ignore, before the general elections in March 2008, and to convince, even promising a significant economic development, when really profound crisis looming worldwide, denotes the political dignity of Mr. Zapatero. If they say they did not know what came over us, worse for his lack of foresight and inability, to prohibit from their relatives, say the word crisis using large balance other imaginative, not to retract the previous discourse.
Truth, identified today with the economic and the statement of Mr. Zapatero is synonymous with lack of education, training and their own criteria. Its messages are held and are intended to give the ears of its advocates. Unions, called class, living the story and subsidies, would be in the current situation of permanent strike. In France, with unemployment of 9%, Sarkozy set him up to a general strike. It is clear that evil is interpreted differently, depending on where it comes. Recently said: "We learned to say no to the powerful." To whom to this it not, when?, Where? I would like to give some names and examples. To my knowledge, helped the powerful (banks). Is the lie goes unpunished in politics? How long? I acknowledge that, personally, the confusion has happened to the laughter.
Lying kills
truth, human relationships and undermines the dignity of individuals. Politicians and the State should not have moral rules than those of citizenship. A Chinese proverb says: "The first time you deceive me, the fault is yours, the second will be mine." A wise ... .... Miguel F.
Jansen
www.cansermiguel.blogspot.com
say is fabricating lies daily work of the creator of images, make us believe Queuña detergent removes all stains without effort is his work, though not true. Political parties hiring advertising teams to give credibility to any argument, election promise, etc. His effort is that the recipient is identified with the discourse of the issuer and once obtained this way, the political lie is played socially as well, a social majority is satisfied and doubts and uncertainties disappear.
disqualify a good name on the charge of corrupt does not require much effort. Launching a rumor and then report it is not complex. Anything goes and there is no code of ethics. They spend all day denying and fighting back. However, the fabrication of lies in politics, is bound to stand the test of time, must endure, you can not short-lived as I would lose legitimacy. The need to believe the lie form part of the plot. Need to be repeated, consistent, the argument to achieve the objective.
The political lie, responds to a conscious, deliberate, of hiding information and evidence, particularly when it weakens the enemy government, opposition, lobby, etc. Examples of this: the fallacious argument put forward by the "trio of the Azores", possession of weapons of mass destruction held by Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Manipulation, when reporting on the responsibility for the bombing of the Atocha station on 11 March 2004. Convince the English and world population that ETA had been permitted a political advantage at a time general election. Ignore, before the general elections in March 2008, and to convince, even promising a significant economic development, when really profound crisis looming worldwide, denotes the political dignity of Mr. Zapatero. If they say they did not know what came over us, worse for his lack of foresight and inability, to prohibit from their relatives, say the word crisis using large balance other imaginative, not to retract the previous discourse.
Truth, identified today with the economic and the statement of Mr. Zapatero is synonymous with lack of education, training and their own criteria. Its messages are held and are intended to give the ears of its advocates. Unions, called class, living the story and subsidies, would be in the current situation of permanent strike. In France, with unemployment of 9%, Sarkozy set him up to a general strike. It is clear that evil is interpreted differently, depending on where it comes. Recently said: "We learned to say no to the powerful." To whom to this it not, when?, Where? I would like to give some names and examples. To my knowledge, helped the powerful (banks). Is the lie goes unpunished in politics? How long? I acknowledge that, personally, the confusion has happened to the laughter.
Lying kills
truth, human relationships and undermines the dignity of individuals. Politicians and the State should not have moral rules than those of citizenship. A Chinese proverb says: "The first time you deceive me, the fault is yours, the second will be mine." A wise ... .... Miguel F.
Jansen
www.cansermiguel.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment