some time we are seeing a television phenomenon, increasingly present, characterized by exploiting the sensationalism, the sleaze and scandal for the sole to attract audience. It defines "Telebasura" by displaying characters, the central concerns, little or no respect for private life or personal privacy, by disregard for the dignity that everyone deserves, if not resort to the use of language loud, rude and lewd, with the intention of making a spectacle of life of certain characters generally lend themselves to being vilified and manipulated, in exchange for fame or monetary compensation. Prima bad taste, the shocking - and in some shows Realty - personal confrontation, insult and denigration of the participants.
This type of program attracts many people. But why its success, is he the gossip part of our social culture? The promoters used telebasura any subject of human interest, political and social event as an excuse to attract audience. Under a hypocritical appearance of concern and complaint, gloat over suffering, free display of feelings and intimate behavior, delving into an endless spiral to surprise the viewer. Trash TV has a number of basic ingredients that make it a factor of misinformation and acculturation. The emergence of relevant characters without culture or social interest, that the only merit to appear on screen is having a child with a famous, allowing debate on complex issues with simplistic explanations which abound demagoguery that, far from shedding light on the problems, helped consolidate the idea of \u200b\u200b"anything goes", with total disregard for fundamental rights such as the presumption of innocence, when interventions are not used to establish "parallel proceedings" based on statements allegedly true.
This phenomenon is most acute in the private TV stations that broadcast in open because they are the most challenging audience loyalty efforts should be made to depend entirely on income advertising contracts, which in turn depend on the ratings. The true client of these TVs is not the viewer but the advertiser. Anything goes to get a hearing. It is significant to ensure the absence of children's programming in the Gaza later in strings like "Antena 3" and "Tele 5" which emit only such programs.
But should implement measures to wipe out the contents that violate human dignity, ethics and moral education? I am not fond of prohibitions that may engage in a hypothetical lack of freedom of expression, but anything that involves fighting to denigrate people. Only with the involvement of all stakeholders: public authorities, chains, advertisers, viewers, not to mention the responsibility of media professionals, which serves to model a different television offer, developing an ethical code of content regulation, promoting programs where prevailing three pillars: information, education and entertainment, leading to respect for constitutional values \u200b\u200bas the right to the accuracy, privacy and dignity . Miguel F.
Jansen
www.cansermiguel.blogspot.com
This type of program attracts many people. But why its success, is he the gossip part of our social culture? The promoters used telebasura any subject of human interest, political and social event as an excuse to attract audience. Under a hypocritical appearance of concern and complaint, gloat over suffering, free display of feelings and intimate behavior, delving into an endless spiral to surprise the viewer. Trash TV has a number of basic ingredients that make it a factor of misinformation and acculturation. The emergence of relevant characters without culture or social interest, that the only merit to appear on screen is having a child with a famous, allowing debate on complex issues with simplistic explanations which abound demagoguery that, far from shedding light on the problems, helped consolidate the idea of \u200b\u200b"anything goes", with total disregard for fundamental rights such as the presumption of innocence, when interventions are not used to establish "parallel proceedings" based on statements allegedly true.
This phenomenon is most acute in the private TV stations that broadcast in open because they are the most challenging audience loyalty efforts should be made to depend entirely on income advertising contracts, which in turn depend on the ratings. The true client of these TVs is not the viewer but the advertiser. Anything goes to get a hearing. It is significant to ensure the absence of children's programming in the Gaza later in strings like "Antena 3" and "Tele 5" which emit only such programs.
But should implement measures to wipe out the contents that violate human dignity, ethics and moral education? I am not fond of prohibitions that may engage in a hypothetical lack of freedom of expression, but anything that involves fighting to denigrate people. Only with the involvement of all stakeholders: public authorities, chains, advertisers, viewers, not to mention the responsibility of media professionals, which serves to model a different television offer, developing an ethical code of content regulation, promoting programs where prevailing three pillars: information, education and entertainment, leading to respect for constitutional values \u200b\u200bas the right to the accuracy, privacy and dignity . Miguel F.
Jansen
www.cansermiguel.blogspot.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment